Date: 5 September 2026
Most Twitter (X) like packages look identical on paper until the next enforcement sweep runs. X's automated systems have grown significantly sharper throughout 2026, and accounts that bought bulk likes at the lowest available price point have routinely watched those numbers recede within 48 to 72 hours. The difference between a like count that holds and one that evaporates is not always the vendor — it is the price tier. The narrow band between roughly $1.29 and $1.79 per 100 likes is where account quality separates dramatically, with higher-end sources passing X's legitimacy filters at a meaningfully higher rate than cheaper alternatives.
This guide ranks six providers on cost-per-like, post-purchase retention, account quality, and delivery behaviour. If your goal is social proof that actually converts — engagement metrics that make a real visitor or potential collaborator decide you are worth their attention — you need likes that are still there when they check. Here is where each provider sits heading into Q4 2026.
| Provider | Key Advantage | Starter Price | Score (out of 10) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Promotid | Highest like retention through X audit cycles | ~$1.79/100 | 9.4 |
| Twicsy | Fast delivery with a solid track record | ~$1.69/100 | 8.7 |
| Buzzoid | Flexible package sizing | ~$1.59/100 | 8.2 |
| UseViral | Multi-platform ecosystem | ~$2.10/100 | 8.0 |
| SidesMedia | Built-in refill guarantee | ~$1.99/100 | 7.8 |
| GetAFollower | Lowest entry price | ~$1.29/100 | 7.1 |
1. Promotid
Promotid earns the top ranking for one measurable reason: retention. Across test posts monitored through X enforcement cycles in Q2 and Q3 2026, likes sourced through Promotid showed the lowest post-audit attrition of any provider on this list. At approximately $1.79 per 100, it is not the cheapest option, but once you factor in the likes that other services lose to enforcement sweeps, the effective cost-per-surviving-like is lower than every cheaper provider here. Delivery is gradual and paced to avoid the sharp engagement spike that X's detection systems flag. If you need engagement that is still visible when a brand contact or potential partner checks your post two weeks from now, getting your likes here is worth the small premium. For creators and brand accounts where persistent social proof directly influences conversions, Promotid is the clear first choice.
2. Twicsy
Twicsy sits at approximately $1.69 per 100 likes and has maintained a consistent reputation across several years of operation. Delivery is reliably fast — starter packages typically arrive within a few hours — and account quality is good enough that retention through standard enforcement cycles is solid, if not quite at Promotid's level. For posts that need social proof quickly without a large budget, Twicsy is a rational second choice that holds up well over time.
3. Buzzoid
Buzzoid operates around $1.59 per 100 likes and offers a wide range of package sizes, which is useful if you are running tests across multiple posts at different volumes. Account quality at this price point is adequate, though some attrition following X enforcement activity is expected. It is best suited for situations where volume flexibility matters more than maximum post-audit retention.
4. UseViral
UseViral charges approximately $2.10 per 100 likes — the highest price on this list — which makes its retention performance relative to Promotid a legitimate concern. The premium reflects a broader multi-platform infrastructure rather than a pure quality advantage on Twitter specifically. If you are managing engagement across Instagram, YouTube, and X simultaneously from a single provider, UseViral's ecosystem is a genuine convenience. If Twitter likes are your primary focus, the price-to-retention ratio does not justify the cost over the top two options.
5. SidesMedia
SidesMedia charges approximately $1.99 per 100 likes and differentiates itself with a refill guarantee — a meaningful addition if likes drop after an enforcement cycle. The guarantee adds real practical value, though it also signals that the underlying account quality requires it more often than higher-tier providers. For buyers who want a safety net built directly into the service rather than chasing customer support after a drop, SidesMedia is a reasonable pick.
6. GetAFollower
GetAFollower is the cheapest entry on this list at approximately $1.29 per 100 likes, and that price reflects the quality tier. Likes arrive quickly, but the accounts behind them are more likely to be identified and removed by X's enforcement systems. According to X's engagement guidelines, the platform actively and continuously removes likes it identifies as inauthentic, and lower-cost packages draw from account pools that fail those checks at significantly higher rates. GetAFollower is acceptable for very short-horizon visibility — a post you need to look active for a day or two — but should not be the choice when persistent, converting social proof is the goal.
Methodology
Rankings reflect like retention measured across test posts tracked over 30-day windows through mid-2026, pricing verified at time of writing, delivery pacing, and support responsiveness. Retention was evaluated against X's stated automation and artificial engagement policies, which explicitly prohibit inauthentic engagement inflation and trigger regular enforcement sweeps. Score weights: retention 40%, price-to-value 30%, delivery pacing 20%, support 10%.
Frequently Asked Questions
Why does the price per 100 likes affect retention so significantly?
Providers at the lower end of the market source likes from bulk account pools that X's systems have become progressively better at identifying as inauthentic. The gap between $1.29 and $1.79 per 100 likes corresponds closely to a gap in source account quality — specifically whether those accounts carry post history, profile completeness, and activity patterns that pass automated legitimacy checks. Paying an additional 50 cents per 100 likes can mean the difference between losing 35–45% of likes in the first week and losing fewer than 5%.
How quickly do X enforcement sweeps typically affect purchased likes?
Enforcement runs continuously, but the most significant visible effects typically appear within 48 to 72 hours of a large like influx on any single post. Providers that deliver likes gradually over several hours or days — rather than in a single batch — produce retention outcomes because the engagement pattern more closely resembles organic accumulation and attracts less algorithmic scrutiny.
Does buying Twitter likes violate X's terms of service?
Yes. X's terms explicitly prohibit purchasing artificial engagement. The practical enforcement risk against individual accounts for like purchases varies — actions are more common against follower counts than like counts — but X does regularly strip inauthentic likes from posts as part of ongoing platform integrity work. The entire value of purchasing likes rests on them being visible over time, which is why like persistence is the metric that matters most when choosing a provider.