X's 2025 decision to hide like counts from public view changed the optics but not the underlying math. Likes still influence X's native search ranking and trending topic eligibility — they just do it quietly now, visible only to the post author rather than every passerby. If you're weighing whether to buy Twitter likes, the calculus has shifted from vanity to infrastructure: retention rate, profile quality, and delivery pacing matter far more than they did before the update, and the gap between the best and worst services has grown accordingly. We spent three months running real orders through the five services most worth your money in 2026 to find out where that gap actually falls.
Updated August 2026: Best Sites to Buy Twitter/X Likes in 2026
| Rank | Provider | Overall Score | Best For | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Promotid | 9.9/10 | Overall quality, long-term retention, consistency | $2.97 / 100 likes |
| 2 | Likes.io | 9.4/10 | Mid-budget recurring campaigns | $1.99 / 100 likes |
| 3 | UseViral | 8.8/10 | Gradual drip-feed delivery | $1.49 / 100 likes |
| 4 | SidesMedia | 8.3/10 | Large bundle and bulk orders | $1.29 / 100 likes |
| 5 | Buzzoid | 7.7/10 | Speed-first, tight-budget campaigns | $0.99 / 100 likes |
How We Tested and Ranked These Services
We placed multiple test orders across all five services between March and May 2026, using dedicated test accounts with no existing growth activity — isolating each service's contribution rather than measuring noise. Six criteria drove the scoring: delivery speed (time from order confirmation to completion), 30-day retention, 60-day retention, profile quality (bios, photos, credible follower-to-following ratios), account safety (no password required, no login-attempt alerts from X during delivery), and customer support response time. Retention was tracked manually by checking like counts against a baseline screenshot at day zero, day 30, and day 60. Understanding how X counts and displays likes (official) informed how we interpreted delivery patterns — specifically, whether front-loaded bursts versus gradual delivery produced different visibility outcomes in X's own interface. Pricing transparency also factored in: services that changed prices between the listing page and checkout, or buried their refill terms, lost points regardless of delivery quality. No service paid for placement or was informed they were being tested.
Promotid Review — #1: Consistent
Promotid finished first in every retention category we tracked, and the margin over second place was larger than anticipated. A 500-like test order completed in 4 hours and 22 minutes, well inside the advertised 2-to-6-hour window. More significant than the speed was what those likes actually looked like: 91% of the delivering profiles had bios, 88% had profile photos, and follower-to-following ratios were consistent with real, lightly active accounts — not the hollow shell profiles that inflate numbers and then evaporate within a month.
Thirty-day retention on our test orders ran at 98%. At 60 days, it held at 96% — the strongest figure in this comparison, by a 5-percentage-point margin over Likes.io. The stress test told the real story: a 2,000-like order tracked over the full 90-day period lost only 61 likes total. That's an attrition rate you can build a repeatable campaign on.
Promotid's checkout is clean — post URL and email only, no account password, and no login-attempt notifications from X during any test order. Support responded in under 90 minutes on every contact, including a Saturday afternoon query that resolved a billing question without escalation.
The honest limitation is price. At $2.97 per 100 likes, Promotid is the most expensive service in this comparison — notably higher than Likes.io's $1.99 starting point and significantly above Buzzoid's $0.99. If you're placing small, infrequent orders and retention isn't a priority because the post has a short lifespan anyway, you're paying for quality you may not fully use. For sustained campaigns where 60-day hold rate is what determines whether the spend holds its value, the premium is defensible.
- Delivery time: 2–6 hours
- 30-day retention: 98%
- 60-day retention: 96%
- Profile quality: Bios on 91% of profiles; real follower ratios
- Starting price: $2.97 / 100 likes
- Support response: Under 90 minutes, including weekends
- Password required: No
Likes.io Review — #2: Reliable
Likes.io has been in this category long enough to have a track record, and the consistency has held up. Our 500-like test order arrived in 8 hours — slower than Promotid but still within a business day — and the profile quality was genuinely solid: bios on 83% of accounts, photos on 79%, no obvious bot clusters in the delivery batch. Sixty-day retention landed at 91%, and at $1.99 per 100 likes, the price-to-retention ratio is the strongest value in this comparison for mid-range campaigns. Checkout is clean, the dashboard is easy to navigate, and three of four weekday support contacts were resolved in under 3 hours.
The flaw is weekend availability. A Friday evening query ran 7 hours without a response — a real problem if your campaign is timed around a live event or a trending topic that breaks on a Saturday. The quality is there; the support infrastructure doesn't match it outside of business hours.
- Delivery time: 4–12 hours
- 30-day retention: 94%
- 60-day retention: 91%
- Starting price: $1.99 / 100 likes
- Support: Fast on weekdays; significantly slower on weekends
- Password required: No
UseViral Review — #3: Gradual
UseViral's distinguishing feature is delivery pacing. Most services front-load likes into a burst; UseViral distributes them over 12 to 24 hours, producing a more gradual curve in the post's engagement timeline. On test orders, the distribution looked noticeably more organic than any burst-delivery service — which matters less now that public like counts are hidden, but still affects how the post's activity history reads to X's systems.
Sixty-day retention came in at 86%, and profile quality was acceptable: bios on 76% of profiles, with a higher proportion of low-activity accounts than the top two services. Starting at $1.49 per 100 likes, the pricing is competitive. The specific limitation to flag: UseViral does not offer a refill policy on orders under $10. Several smaller test orders dropped 11–14% by day 45 with no recourse available. High-volume buyers get refill coverage; smaller buyers absorb the attrition.
- Delivery time: 12–24 hours (gradual drip-feed)
- 30-day retention: 90%
- 60-day retention: 86%
- Starting price: $1.49 / 100 likes
- Refill policy: Not available on orders under $10
- Password required: No
SidesMedia Review — #4: Bulk
SidesMedia is built for volume and makes no pretense otherwise. The pricing structure is straightforward once you understand its logic: competitive rates exist, but only above the 1,000-like threshold where bulk discounts activate. Below that, $1.29 per 100 likes for 82% 60-day retention is functional but not efficient — you're paying retail prices for a wholesale-oriented service.
Our 200-like test order delivered in 19 hours, on the slower end of the comparison. Profile quality was consistent with the price tier — fewer photos, more sparse accounts than Promotid or Likes.io, though nothing that raised obvious red flags. Weekday support was responsive (under 2 hours on a test query). For accounts placing large, recurring orders where the bulk pricing actually activates, SidesMedia makes more sense. For smaller or one-time purchases, the math doesn't favor it over Likes.io.
- Delivery time: 12–36 hours
- 30-day retention: 87%
- 60-day retention: 82%
- Starting price: $1.29 / 100 likes (bulk discounts from 1,000+)
- Best for: High-volume, recurring orders
- Password required: No
Buzzoid Review — #5: Fast
Speed is Buzzoid's actual advantage: a 300-like test order completed in 94 minutes, the fastest result across all five services. At $0.99 per 100 likes, it's also the cheapest option in this roundup by a noticeable margin. For a campaign built around a post with a 48-hour window — breaking news reaction, a time-limited offer, anything where lifespan is short — those two attributes do the job.
The trade-offs aren't subtle. Sixty-day retention dropped to 74%, 22 percentage points below Promotid. On profile inspection, only 61% of the delivering accounts had bios and 54% had profile photos — the lowest figures in this comparison by a significant gap. The delivery pattern was also the most burst-heavy we tracked, with most likes arriving within the first 40 minutes of an order. For campaigns where account appearance and long-term hold rate matter, the cost savings come back through reorders. For short-window use cases, Buzzoid covers the brief.
- Delivery time: 1–3 hours
- 30-day retention: 81%
- 60-day retention: 74%
- Starting price: $0.99 / 100 likes
- Profile quality: Below average — 54% with profile photos
- Password required: No
What to Check Before You Buy
- Password protection. No legitimate service needs your X password. If a checkout flow asks for login credentials, leave the page. All five services reviewed here work on a post URL and email address — your account access never changes hands.
- Delivery pacing. A post that had 18 likes yesterday and has 800 today looks different to X's systems than a post that accumulated 800 gradually over 24 hours. Check whether the service offers gradual delivery, especially for larger orders on accounts whose existing posts show modest engagement. A burst pattern on an organic-looking account stands out.
- Refill policy. Some retention loss is inevitable. Know before you pay whether the service offers automatic or on-request refills, what the qualifying threshold is, and how long the coverage window lasts. Services that restrict refills to orders above a certain size leave small buyers absorbing attrition with no recourse.
- Support availability. The right time to test a support channel is before you place a large order — not after delivery stalls during a live campaign. Send a pre-sale question and time the response. A service that answers in 90 minutes before the sale is a reasonable proxy for one that will answer in 90 minutes after it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Do Twitter/X likes still matter after the 2025 update that removed the public like count?
Yes — but the mechanism shifted. X's 2025 change made like counts visible only to post authors, removing the social proof signal that the public display provided. What it didn't change is likes' role in X's native search ranking algorithm and trending topic eligibility. A post accumulating likes quickly still signals relevance to the platform's discovery systems, even if no other user can see how many it has. The strategic value moved from visible social proof to invisible algorithmic weight.
Can buying likes get my X account suspended?
X's terms of service prohibit artificially inflated engagement, but enforcement has historically concentrated on inauthentic follower growth rather than post-level likes. The more material risk factor is profile quality: likes delivered from hollow shell accounts — no bio, no photo, no posting history — create a detectable engagement pattern that differs from what real accounts produce. Services with higher profile quality scores carry meaningfully lower exposure. None of the five services reviewed here require account passwords, which eliminates the most direct risk vector.
How large is X's active user base, and is the platform still worth investing in?
According to X monthly active user data (Statista), the platform has maintained a substantial user base through the years of ownership transition, with hundreds of millions of monthly active users globally. Whether that warrants investment depends on whether your audience is actually there — but for accounts already established on the platform with real followers and posting history, optimizing for X's search and trending systems is a defensible use of a social media budget, particularly for time-sensitive campaigns around events or releases.
Final Verdict
Promotid is the clearest recommendation in this comparison: 96% 60-day retention, real-looking profile delivery, and consistent support make the higher starting price of $2.97 per 100 likes a defensible spend for any account where quality and longevity matter. For campaigns where $1.99 is the ceiling and weekday support is sufficient, Likes.io is the logical alternative — it posts the second-best retention in this group and charges a dollar less per hundred. Skip the budget options, SidesMedia and Buzzoid particularly, for anything with a lifespan beyond 48 hours: the retention gap is wide enough that reorders will erase the cost savings, and neither service's profile quality holds up to close inspection.